<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Google Wave become a Disruptive, Good Enough BPMS?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.actionbase.com/can-google-wave-become-a-disruptive-good-enough-bpms/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.actionbase.com/can-google-wave-become-a-disruptive-good-enough-bpms?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=can-google-wave-become-a-disruptive-good-enough-bpms</link>
	<description>Pondering Human Process Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:17:58 +0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LLoyd Buster</title>
		<link>http://blog.actionbase.com/can-google-wave-become-a-disruptive-good-enough-bpms/comment-page-1#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>LLoyd Buster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.actionbase.com/?p=196#comment-533</guid>
		<description>Very nice, I sure will be coming back more often. I bookmarked your site also, thank you. This is my loved sites : &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mbi.com.tr/eng/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;erp&lt;/A&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice, I sure will be coming back more often. I bookmarked your site also, thank you. This is my loved sites : <a href="http://www.mbi.com.tr/eng/" rel="nofollow">erp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janette Pritchett</title>
		<link>http://blog.actionbase.com/can-google-wave-become-a-disruptive-good-enough-bpms/comment-page-1#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>Janette Pritchett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 09:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.actionbase.com/?p=196#comment-532</guid>
		<description>Just want to say your article is awesome. The clearness in your post is simply impressive and i can assume you are an expert on this subject. Well with your permission allow me to grab your rss feed to keep up to date with incoming post. Thanks a million and please keep up the respectable work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just want to say your article is awesome. The clearness in your post is simply impressive and i can assume you are an expert on this subject. Well with your permission allow me to grab your rss feed to keep up to date with incoming post. Thanks a million and please keep up the respectable work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Barel</title>
		<link>http://blog.actionbase.com/can-google-wave-become-a-disruptive-good-enough-bpms/comment-page-1#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Barel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 15:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.actionbase.com/?p=196#comment-483</guid>
		<description>@klaitner: We actually addressed this issue on our blog a while back - http://blog.actionbase.com/bpm-and-google-wave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@klaitner: We actually addressed this issue on our blog a while back &#8211; <a href="http://blog.actionbase.com/bpm-and-google-wave" rel="nofollow">http://blog.actionbase.com/bpm-and-google-wave</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klaitner</title>
		<link>http://blog.actionbase.com/can-google-wave-become-a-disruptive-good-enough-bpms/comment-page-1#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>klaitner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.actionbase.com/?p=196#comment-478</guid>
		<description>SAP Gravity is an excellent example of Google Wave being used for BPM
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/15618

Unfortunately they have not yet released it publicly and it is uncertain whether it will be a separate paid/free product or part of SAP&#039;s suite

Disclosure: I have no relationship with SAP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SAP Gravity is an excellent example of Google Wave being used for BPM<br />
<a href="http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/15618" rel="nofollow">http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/15618</a></p>
<p>Unfortunately they have not yet released it publicly and it is uncertain whether it will be a separate paid/free product or part of SAP&#8217;s suite</p>
<p>Disclosure: I have no relationship with SAP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Did Microsoft Copy Mac OS for Windows 7?; Office 2010 Public Beta Next Week?; Cloud Computing Revenue Up 18% - SharePoint Daily - Bamboo Nation</title>
		<link>http://blog.actionbase.com/can-google-wave-become-a-disruptive-good-enough-bpms/comment-page-1#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>Did Microsoft Copy Mac OS for Windows 7?; Office 2010 Public Beta Next Week?; Cloud Computing Revenue Up 18% - SharePoint Daily - Bamboo Nation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.actionbase.com/?p=196#comment-477</guid>
		<description>[...] Can Google Wave Become a Disruptive, Good Enough BPMS? (Action Blog)I have been wondering about whether there something akin to good enough BPM when it comes to people oriented process (which are most processes in organizations). It seems to me that for these types of processes a full-fledged BPMS implementation is overkill. Not just the upfront purchase cost, but all the upfront process discovery, modeling and implementation resources needed for a BPM implementation. When all is said and done even a simple BPM implementation can cost $200K-$500K in total cost of implementation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Can Google Wave Become a Disruptive, Good Enough BPMS? (Action Blog)I have been wondering about whether there something akin to good enough BPM when it comes to people oriented process (which are most processes in organizations). It seems to me that for these types of processes a full-fledged BPMS implementation is overkill. Not just the upfront purchase cost, but all the upfront process discovery, modeling and implementation resources needed for a BPM implementation. When all is said and done even a simple BPM implementation can cost $200K-$500K in total cost of implementation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Shuey</title>
		<link>http://blog.actionbase.com/can-google-wave-become-a-disruptive-good-enough-bpms/comment-page-1#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Shuey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.actionbase.com/?p=196#comment-469</guid>
		<description>While I agree with you in premise I don&#039;t think GoogleWave will be replacing any BPM systems in the near future. Not because it&#039;s not good enough --- it&#039;s because that&#039;s not what GWAVE is designed to do.

With that said --- I can absolutely see Google Wave being a starting point for workflow steps. I can also see Google Wave as an option to manage the &quot;in-flight&quot; content, steps and also to be the designated end point.

Google Wave has a lot of potential as a tool to enhance every horizontal business application (BPM, CRM, ERP, SCM, PLM, etc.). If the API is as open as it seems I expect a lot of developers will star to take advantage of the inherent capabilities and perhaps Google will form a partner ecosystem with a broad collection of solutions. I blogged about this opportunity &amp; risk for Google here - Gone Google – Will it Work? - http://bit.ly/gVcHS

The potential is there.

btw - I like your HPM way of thinking. There is a definite distinction between Human and System based workflow. I&#039;d like to chat with your more about this as this is what I&#039;ve worked on for 15+ years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree with you in premise I don&#8217;t think GoogleWave will be replacing any BPM systems in the near future. Not because it&#8217;s not good enough &#8212; it&#8217;s because that&#8217;s not what GWAVE is designed to do.</p>
<p>With that said &#8212; I can absolutely see Google Wave being a starting point for workflow steps. I can also see Google Wave as an option to manage the &#8220;in-flight&#8221; content, steps and also to be the designated end point.</p>
<p>Google Wave has a lot of potential as a tool to enhance every horizontal business application (BPM, CRM, ERP, SCM, PLM, etc.). If the API is as open as it seems I expect a lot of developers will star to take advantage of the inherent capabilities and perhaps Google will form a partner ecosystem with a broad collection of solutions. I blogged about this opportunity &amp; risk for Google here &#8211; Gone Google – Will it Work? &#8211; <a href="http://bit.ly/gVcHS" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/gVcHS</a></p>
<p>The potential is there.</p>
<p>btw &#8211; I like your HPM way of thinking. There is a definite distinction between Human and System based workflow. I&#8217;d like to chat with your more about this as this is what I&#8217;ve worked on for 15+ years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Can Google Wave become a Disruptive, Good Enough BPMS? &#124; ActionBase Blog - Thoughts on Collaboration Process Management Unstructured Compliance and Audit -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.actionbase.com/can-google-wave-become-a-disruptive-good-enough-bpms/comment-page-1#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Can Google Wave become a Disruptive, Good Enough BPMS? &#124; ActionBase Blog - Thoughts on Collaboration Process Management Unstructured Compliance and Audit -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.actionbase.com/?p=196#comment-468</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Michael Jessopp and ActionBase, Scott Francis. Scott Francis said: RT @skemsley: Interesting exercise: Can Google Wave become a Disruptive, Good Enough BPMS? http://j.mp/425AQR &gt; if excel can why not wave:) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Michael Jessopp and ActionBase, Scott Francis. Scott Francis said: RT @skemsley: Interesting exercise: Can Google Wave become a Disruptive, Good Enough BPMS? <a href="http://j.mp/425AQR" rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/425AQR</a> &gt; if excel can why not wave:) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
