http://blog.actionbase.com/what-is-good-enough-bpm-part-ii-bpm-components?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=what-is-good-enough-bpm-part-ii-bpm-components Pondering Human Process Management Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:13:23 +0300 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://blog.actionbase.com/what-is-good-enough-bpm-part-ii-bpm-components/comment-page-1#comment-548 Jacob Ukelson Sun, 10 Jan 2010 08:40:30 +0000 http://blog.actionbase.com/?p=255#comment-548 Rashid, Thanks for the comment. I am not trying to position ActionBase or Google Wave as good enough BPM - we are both a lot more than that. The problem is that when folks in the industry use the word "process" - they go directly down the BPM path though it may be overkill, or completely inappropriate. By using the term "good-enough" BPM - I am hoping to get tools like ours to be part of the business process conversation, and not be ignored just because we aren't (nor do we want to be) a BPMS. Rashid,
Thanks for the comment. I am not trying to position ActionBase or Google Wave as good enough BPM – we are both a lot more than that. The problem is that when folks in the industry use the word “process” – they go directly down the BPM path though it may be overkill, or completely inappropriate. By using the term “good-enough” BPM – I am hoping to get tools like ours to be part of the business process conversation, and not be ignored just because we aren’t (nor do we want to be) a BPMS.

]]> http://blog.actionbase.com/what-is-good-enough-bpm-part-ii-bpm-components/comment-page-1#comment-543 Rashid Khan Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:22:33 +0000 http://blog.actionbase.com/?p=255#comment-543 Interesting.I think that if you would focus on what is important about your product you wil be more successful, instead of the "good enough BPM" theme. There are many many processes that do not need a full blown BPMS, and things like Google Wave and maybe ActionBase can address these effectively and excel at it. Every product that deals with processes does not have to be labelled BPM or good-enough BPM. Please see my recent posts on wny I think the world could benefit from simplification. Interesting.I think that if you would focus on what is important about your product you wil be more successful, instead of the “good enough BPM” theme. There are many many processes that do not need a full blown BPMS, and things like Google Wave and maybe ActionBase can address these effectively and excel at it. Every product that deals with processes does not have to be labelled BPM or good-enough BPM. Please see my recent posts on wny I think the world could benefit from simplification.

]]>